Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
MEDICC Rev ; 24(3-4): 18-23, 2022 Oct 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2146581

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In November 2021, omicron-a new SARS-CoV-2 variant-was identified in South Africa and almost immediately, WHO declared it a 'variant of concern'. In view of its rapid worldwide spread and its imminent introduction in Cuba, genomic surveillance was strengthened. OBJECTIVE: Describe cases during the first eight epidemiological weeks (epiweeks) of SARS-CoV-2 infection attributable to omicron variant in Cuba by clinical and epidemiological variables. METHODS: From epiweek 48, 2021 to epiweek 4, 2022, 288 nasopharyngeal swabs were processed for sequencing of a 1836 bp fragment of the S gene. Variants were identified according to GISAID database and confirmed by phylogenetic analysis. Variants' association with clinical and epidemiological outcomes was assessed. RESULTS: The first cases of omicron variant were imported, mostly from African countries and the United States. During the period studied, omicron was detected in 83.0% (239/288) of cases processed, while the delta variant was found in 17.0% (49/288). Most persons infected with omicron were symptomatic (63.2%; 151/239) and fully vaccinated (65.3%; 156/239); severe cases and deaths occurred mainly among patients aged ≥65 years (92.9%; 13/14), and 12 of these deaths occurred in fully vaccinated persons (92.3%; 12/13). Omicron spread rapidly throughout the country (from 10% of cases in epiweek 48, 2021, to 100% by epiweek 4, 2022), displacing the formerly predominant delta variant. CONCLUSIONS: Omicron's rapid expansion in Cuba was associated with increased incidence but not with a higher case fatality rate. The relatively milder disease in those infected with this variant could be influenced by the high vaccination coverage, along with the natural immunity acquired as a consequence of previous virus infection.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Filogenia , Cuba/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología
2.
J Med Virol ; 94(3): 1001-1008, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1718366

RESUMEN

One of the challenges for control and prevention of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is the early diagnostic at the point of care. Several tests based on qualitative antigen detection have been developed; one of these is Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics). In total, 523 nasopharyngeal swabs were randomly selected with the aims to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, cross-reactivity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV), and agreement of Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen immunoassay using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) STAT-NAT® coronavirus disease-2019 as reference test. Cross-reactivity was estimated using samples positive by RT-PCR to other respiratory viruses (influenza virus, parainfluenza virus, rhinovirus, coronavirus OC43, and HKU1). The overall sensitivity of Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen was 89.72% (288/321); specificity was 90.59% (183/202); and cross-reactivity to other respiratory viruses were not detected. Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen immunoassay showed a high sensitivity in samples with cycle threshold value <30, which ranged from 92.81% to 95.40%, independently of symptoms. PPV and NPV were 93.81% and 84.72%, respectively. The κ coefficient was 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.84), showing substantial agreement between both tests. The results suggest Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen immunoassay could be used as an alternative to RT-PCR testing, or in complement with it, to identify infectious individuals and reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Reacciones Cruzadas , Humanos , Inmunoensayo/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA